Jewawares! -two philosophies-“Separatists” and “Inclusionists”!
This note is an acknowledgement that there are two main groups in the Jewaware community ( those that are aware of who the jews are, what they, as a people are striving to accomplish, and the power that they,currently, have and the ways they use that power). Generally, included in this knowledge is an awareness of jewish history,awareness of the talmud, and an ability to access that knowledge thru non- jew approved sources. What I want to do is put ourselves (jewawares) into two categories, that seem to dominate this movement. I am not going to analyze whether one view is correct as much as to,simply,give you my take on the components that make up each movement,in a general sort of way.One approach to outing jewish power is thru the “Separatist” approach.It is currently made up of pure blooded, white Aryans,or, in some cases, slightly compromised blood mix.They see the jew as, primarily, targeting their own race, and, pretty much, see it as a direct fight between the white man and the jew;there may be a few black separatists, or Arab separatists, but their numbers are miniscule compared to whites. The other, I call the “Inclusionists”, they accept the jew at his word, that he has, indeed, included all non -jews as adversaries to jewish aims and as targets for enslavement.Because of this, an “Inclusionist” prefers to embrace all non jews as potential brothers or comrades and acts,accordingly. The following paragraphs will go into these two divisions in more detail. At the outset, It’s important,if our movement is to mature, and we are to have some success in our endeavors, to,clearly,separate these two movements for they have some irreconciliable differences while,also,having some commonalities that make for possible temporary cooperation.It also allows the two groups to disavow needless baggage of the others as they focus on the jew fight!
Now, I will analyze the “Separatist” jewawares, then the “Inclusionist” and having done that offer up a few examples of areas we differ,which are severe, and areas we can agree.Since there is a “rope pull” going on about a desire to bring certain gentile groups into our midst, and there seems to be no way to appease either side,in my opinion, the only, intelligent, course of action is to create two different and distinct entities (political parties?),swirling around the jew, outing him for his treachery in much the same way that , in America, the democrats and republicans swirl around the jew protecting him and following his orders. It is also my hope that gathering around a “Separatist”,-“Inclusionist” dynamic,we can quit the petty attacking each other over the issues neither is planning to give on and focus on our common agreements. Now for “The Separatist” view.
From my vantage point, “Separatists” have great pride in family, race and Country.Being jewawares, and knowing how our government has been coopted by internationalists at the top,I think it’s safe to say that country pride is not a reference to those in power but to the land they grew up in and the neighbors they have come to know.Most, as I said before, are a white, caucasian, aryan extraction, and have a belief in keeping the race pure and separated. Some hold the position that other gentile groups don’t, fully , deserve a human classification.Many see Muslims and Arabs to be a threat to their way of life due to their mass immigration into European countries and their, supposed, desire to spread sharia law everywhere. They, mostly, understand that the jew has been orchestrating much of these problems from behind the curtain but are still convinced that as much attention must be foccussed on other ethnic behavior as on the jew.They believe god or nature separated the races for a reason, and bad things happen when they interact too much.They are , also, fully convinced that many of these other gentiles are, hopelessly, coopted into the jew camp, thus, further, making their interests in working with other gentile minorities null and void.
Now my conception of “Inclusionists” would be that it encompasses all ppls concerned with jewish power from all gentile ethnicities .They are aware of the culture clashes going on, but consider it more of an orchestrated phenomenom than an, inevitably, negative occurrance while admitting that , currently, it is a, mostly, negative occurance.They look to the proclamations of the protocols in using various gentile , ethnic interactions as a source of conflict and as a buffer distraction from the elite, talmudic jews which plays out in such areas as wars between gentile powers fought for jewish profit and jewish aims,and massive immigration with the purpose to undermine the host nation and dilute the base, etc.They understand that jewish power comes from a divided goyim and so believe the antidote to that is to create a unified goyim. To him, this means being careful to use respectful language when referring to all gentiles and to trace conflicts to the jew source rather than bog down on the pawn, gentile irritant which then raises suspicion and trust issues among all involved.Views on race can vary a lot, but a decision has been made that to defeat the jew,as many noble, gentile bodies are needed as possible.
A conflict ,I have noticed arising, by being one loosely defined jewaware entity, is amongst the predominant white element, who seem to demonstate a dislike, bordering on hatred, for blacks, especially, but other gentiles as well. This has taken the form of daily rantings in public, demonstrating their lack of respect, and reinforcing the opinion that other ethnicities are at war with the white man,for example, with post after post of black on white horror stories.I have yet to recall any positive posts by these “Separatists” concerning their target gentiles of concern.This troubles “Inclusionists” who would prefer to post stories that might elicit curiosity, and interest from other gentiles rather than the distrust that is, currently, occurring.
This leads me to my claim that forming two movements to accomodate each side, or political party would be the best solution for both sides to target their own message without the infighting that the jew soooo likes!For me as an “Inclusionist”, the idea of recruiting someone, only to be undermined by my own people in that effort by opposite signals being sent at strategic moments, makes me believe that outreach without clarity of purpose can not be accomplished, and for clarity of purpose to take hold, like minded thinkers on the basics of operation need to come together and unlike minded thinkers need to be removed . Look folks, everyone is waiting for some dynamic occurance to happen to wake us up. The jew, himself , has proved that it takes a coordinated attack to make progress towards a goal.He has also, divided up his resources into seemingly opposite camps. He covers every area of dissent with his own.It’s really not such a monumental occurrance to,fracture ourselves a bit, strategically, in this fight.This is my call for that-both groups can contribute, even join hands on occasion, but there are irreconciliable differences in the jewaware community that precludes working together, daily .”Separatists”, don’t want” Inclusionist” baggage to rebut, and neither do Inclusionists want to deal with separatist claims that they disagree with.Focussing on the jew, is what we all have in common ,and whether that be ending the fed, fighting Obamacare, or stopping our troops from supporting Israel, we all have a dog in that fight.Let’s come together when we have the same dog in the same fight, and stay apart, otherwise and, in this fashion ,we can best keep our eyes on the prize (Jewish power and it’s abuse and removal). A final thought is that if we did separate our efforts, when we do come together, lets leave our conflicts at home and focus on the current goal which brought us together.
So to wrap up, I think we need to divide our jewaware zionist challenging strategy into two political parties so that our primary concern of stopping jewish power over our lives, doesn’t get bogged down with secondary issues that many of us differ on.I have identified, the dividing line as “Separatist” and Inclusionist” , primarily over issues of” to what extent various goyim ethnicities are to get envolved with this fight”, a fight that the jew wins by dividing and conquering us-Thanks!